Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711725›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Development and Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for the Detection of Emergency Department Patients with Opioid Misuse from Clinical Notes.

Usman Shahid, Natalie Parde, Dale L Smith, Grayson Dickinson, Joseph Bianco, Dillon Thorpe, Madhav Hota, Majid Afshar, Niranjan S Karnik, Neeraj Chhabra

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07498322 (Chicago Data-driven Opioid Use Disorder Screening, Engagement, Treatment and Planning System), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07498322 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Chicago Data-driven Opioid Use Disorder Screening, Engagement, Treatment and Planning System

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoRan2026 to 2029Enrolled271,031ConditionsOpiod Use DisorderArmsOUD screening, MOUD, Continuity of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Usman ShahidAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Natalie PardeAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0072-7499
Dale L SmithAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Grayson DickinsonWilliam Carey University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Joseph BiancoUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA.
Dillon ThorpeAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Madhav HotaUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Majid AfsharDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-4652
Niranjan S KarnikAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7650-3008
Neeraj ChhabraAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0945-1233

Funding

Strengthening Stakeholder Engagement in Human Research Protections.UL1TR002003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2016 to 2024
$33.7M
Data Driven Strategies for Substance Misuse Identification in Hospitalized PatientsR01DA051464 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Majid Afshar · 2020 to 2026
$4.5M
Chicago Data-driven OUD Screening, Engagement, Treatment and Planning (C-DOSETaP) SystemR61DA057629 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH · 2023 to 2023
$1.1M
Machine learning approaches for the detection of emergency department patients with opioid misuseK23DA055061 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Neeraj Chhabra · 2022 to 2026
$993k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002003NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA055061NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051464NIDA NIH HHS R61 DA057629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The accurate identification of Emergency Department (ED) encounters involving opioid misuse is critical for health services, research, and surveillance. We sought to develop natural language processing (NLP)-based models for the detection of ED encounters involving opioid misuse. Methods: A sample of ED encounters enriched for opioid misuse was manually annotated and clinical notes extracted. We evaluated classic machine learning (ML) methods, fine-tuning of publicly available pretrained language models, and a previously developed convolutional neural network opioid classifier for use on hospitalized patients (SMART-AI). Performance was compared to ICD-10-CM codes. Both raw text and text transformed to the United Medical Language System were evaluated. Face validity was evaluated by term feature importance. Results: There were 1123 encounters used for training, validation, and testing. Of the classic ML methods, XGBoost had the highest AU_PRC (0.936), accuracy (0.887), and F1 score (0.863) which outperformed ICD-10-CM codes [accuracy 0.870; F1 0.830]. Logistic regression, support vector machine, and XGBoost models had higher AU_PRC using transformed text, while decision trees performed better using raw text. Excluding XGBoost, fine-tuned pre-trained language models outperformed classic ML methods. The best performing model was the fine-tuned SMART-AI based model with domain adaptation [AU_PRC 0.948; accuracy 0.882; F1 0.851]. Explainability analyses showed the most predictive terms were 'heroin', 'opioids', 'alcoholic intoxication, chronic', 'cocaine', 'opiates', and 'suboxone'. Conclusions: NLP-based models outperform entry of ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for the detection of ED encounters with opioid misuse. Fine tuning with domain adaptation for pre-trained language models resulted in improved performance.

Identifiers

PMID39711725
PMCPMC11661385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.