Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711683›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2024

Early Palliative Care Following Aborted Cancer Surgery: Results of a Prospective Feasibility Trial.

Jordan M Cloyd, Rakhsha Khatri, Angela Sarna, Lena Stevens, Victor Heh, Mary Dillhoff, Alex Kim, Timothy M Pawlik, Aslam Ejaz, Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jordan M CloydFrom the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Rakhsha KhatriFrom the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Angela SarnaFrom the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Lena StevensFrom the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Victor HehFrom the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Mary DillhoffFrom the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Alex KimDepartment of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Timothy M PawlikFrom the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Aslam EjazDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Sharla Wells-Di GregorioDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Erin ScottDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Sachin S KaleDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although resection is generally necessary for curative-intent treatment of most solid organ cancers, surgery is occasionally aborted due to intraoperative findings. Following aborted cancer surgery, patients have unique care needs that specialized palliative care (PC) providers may be best equipped to manage. We hypothesized that early ambulatory PC referral following aborted cancer surgery would be feasible and acceptable. Methods: This single-institution prospective clinical trial enrolled adult patients with gastrointestinal or hepatopancreatobiliary cancer with no prior PC exposure who had curative-intent oncologic surgery that was unexpectedly aborted. The primary endpoint was the completion of an ambulatory PC consultation within 30 days of enrollment. Secondary outcomes included changes in standardized measures of quality-of-life (QOL) and anxiety/depression during the 3-month follow-up. Results: Among 25 enrolled participants, the mean age was 65.3 ± 9.9 years, 68% were male, and 88% were White. The most common types of cancers were pancreatic (44%), hepatobiliary (20%), and colorectal (12%); reasons for aborting surgery were occult metastatic disease (52%) and local unresectability (36%). Only 13 of 25 (52%) met the primary endpoint of ambulatory PC within 30 days, less than the prespecified threshold of 70%. Overall, 16 (64%) patients completed ambulatory PC consultation a mean of 29.2 ± 15.8 days after enrollment. Of the 9 (36%) who did not, reasons included patient preference (n = 4), withdrawal from study (n = 1), lost to follow-up (n = 1), scheduling conflict (n = 1), and required inpatient PC before discharge (n = 2). Anxiety (4.94 ± 3.56 vs 3.35 ± 2.60, Conclusions: Barriers to early ambulatory palliative care consultation exist after aborted cancer surgery. Given the unique and complex care needs of this patient population, additional research is needed to optimize supportive care strategies.

Indexed as

clinical trialgastrointestinal cancerhepatopancreatobiliary cancerquality of lifesupportive care

Identifiers

PMID39711683
PMCPMC11661761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.