ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2024
Impact of Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest in the Brain-dead Donors on the Outcome of Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective and Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of cardiac arrest time (CAT) in brain-dead donors on graft and recipient outcomes following liver transplantation. Background: The outcome of livers from brain-dead donors with a history of cardiac arrest (CA) remains controversial, and the duration of the CAT has never been evaluated. Methods: A retrospective review of data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 2003 and 2022 was conducted. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize confounding effects. Results: A total of 115,202 recipients were included, 7364 (6.4%) and 107,838 (93.6%) of whom were of the CA and non-CA group, respectively. After 1:1 propensity score matching, each group consisted of 7157 cases. The CA group demonstrated shorter hospital stay (15.5 ± 20.0 days vs. 16.2 ± 21.3 days, Conclusions: The use of brain-dead donors with a history of CA did not increase the risk of liver graft failure in our study. A downtime of <30 minutes may confer protective effects on transplanted grafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.