Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711652›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2024

Adjuvant Therapy after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?: Multi-institution Worldwide Observational Study.

Siva Raja, Thomas W Rice, Min Lu, Marie E Semple, Andrew J Toth, Eugene H Blackstone, Sudish C Murthy, Usman Ahmad, Michael McNamara, Hemant Ishwaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Siva RajaFrom the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Thomas W RiceFrom the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Min LuDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Marie E SempleLerner Research Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Andrew J TothLerner Research Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Eugene H BlackstoneFrom the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Sudish C MurthyFrom the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Usman AhmadFrom the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Michael McNamaraDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Hemant IshwaranDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, FL.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
NextGen Random ForestsR01GM125072 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ISHWARAN, HEMANT · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Based on current practice guidelines, we hypothesized that most patients with esophageal cancer, particularly those with locally advanced cancer, would benefit from adjuvant therapy after esophagectomy Background: Although esophagectomy alone is now an uncommon therapy for treating locally advanced esophageal cancer, the value of adjuvant therapy after esophagectomy is unknown. Methods: From 1970 to 2014, 22,123 consecutive patients from 33 centers on 6 continents (Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration) were diagnosed with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma (n = 7526) or squamous cell carcinoma (n = 5625), of whom 10,873 received esophagectomy alone and 2278 additional adjuvant therapy. Random forests for survival and virtual-twin analyses were performed for all-cause mortality. Results: For adenocarcinoma, adjuvant therapy was beneficial only in pT4NanyM0 cancers (6-8 month survival benefit) and in pTanyN3M0 cancers (4-8 month benefit); a survival decrement was observed in pT1-3N0M0 cancers, with no effect on TanyN1-2M0 cancers. In squamous cell carcinoma, there was a 4 to 21 month survival benefit for pT3-4N0M0 cancers and a 4 to 15 month survival benefit for pT2-4N1-3M0 cancers. Conclusions: Adjuvant therapy after esophagectomy appears to benefit most patients with node-positive squamous cell carcinoma, but for adenocarcinoma, its value is limited to deep cancers and to those with substantial nodal burden. Future studies of the role of adjuvant therapies should treat these 2 cancers differently, with guidelines reflecting the histopathologic-appropriate survival value of adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

esophageal and esophagogastric canceresophagectomyrandom forest analysisvirtual-twin analysis

Identifiers

PMID39711652
PMCPMC11661710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.