ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Return to Sports After Surgical Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tear in Young Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Young athletes who undergo surgery for a rotator cuff tear (RCT) are expected to return to sports (RTS) at the preinjury level. Purpose: To determine the rate and level of RTS and associated factors after RCT surgery in young athletes. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were studies in English evaluating RTS after surgical treatment of RCTs in athletes <40 years. Study quality was evaluated according to the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies scores. Fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to investigate the overall RTS rate and the ability to RTS at the preinjury level and explore the heterogeneity of the studies. Results: Of 168 studies initially identified, 13 studies (332 athletes; 270 competitive and 62 recreational) were included. The mean age of the athletes was 26.1 years (range, 13.2-39 years). Eleven studies (289 athletes) reported the type of sports; the most common sports were baseball (n = 195), football (n = 47), and tennis (n = 13). A total of 25 athletes were lost to follow-up, leaving 307 athletes with postoperative RTS data for meta-analysis. The combined rate of RTS according to the fixed-effects model was 84% (95% CI, 80%-88%). The level of RTS was evaluated in 11 studies (251 athletes), and according to the random-effects models, the combined rate of RTS at the preinjury level was 63% (95% CI, 49%-77%). In a subgroup analysis, the rate of RTS at the preinjury level was significantly different between competitive athletes (61% [95% CI, 46%-76%]) and recreational athletes (89% [95% CI, 78%-99%]) ( Conclusion: Results of this review indicated that most young athletes were able to RTS after RCT surgery, and more than half were able to RTS at the preinjury level. Compared with competitive athletes, a higher proportion of recreational athletes were able to RTS at the preinjury level after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.