Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711608›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Comparing Postoperative Outcomes of Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and the "Terrible Triad" Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Medial Meniscus Ramp and Lateral Meniscus Root Repairs.

Evan P Shoemaker, Luke V Tollefson, Nicholas I Kennedy, Rebecca Stone McGaver, Morgan Homan, Kayla J Sieffert, Ayush D Shah, Corey A Wulf, Christopher M Larson, Brian P Bjerke and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Evan P ShoemakerTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Luke V TollefsonTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Nicholas I KennedyTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Rebecca Stone McGaverTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Morgan HomanTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Kayla J SieffertTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Ayush D ShahUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5346-4314
Corey A WulfTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Christopher M LarsonTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Brian P BjerkeTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Robert F LaPradeTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A new "terrible triad" has been reported to be an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear with a concomitant medial meniscus ramp tear and lateral meniscus root tear. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) versus an ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs are not well known. Purpose: To compare postoperative outcomes between isolated ACLR and ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: An initial cohort of 1228 patients with ACLRs were retrospectively identified between April 2016 and November 2021. A total of 41 patients with isolated ACLR (isolated cohort) were age and sex matched to 41 patients who had an ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs (triad cohort). Patients in the triad cohort were identified consecutively by date of surgery. Preoperative and ≥2-year postoperative PROs were evaluated to compare the isolated cohort with the triad cohort. Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired Results: Both the isolated cohort and triad cohort demonstrated significant differences between preoperative and postoperative PROs in all questionnaire categories assessed. Postoperative scores for the International Knee Documentation Committee (isolated, 88.8; triad, 86.2; Conclusion: No significant differences in PROs were found at minimum follow-up of 2 years postoperatively between the patients who underwent isolated ACLR (isolated cohort) and those who underwent ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs (triad cohort). Inferior outcomes were not observed in the triad cohort when revision rates, reoperation rates, and postoperative PROs were compared. Given the optimistic short-term outcomes for isolated versus triad ACLR patients and the known biomechanical consequences of these untreated meniscal injuries, medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs should be performed when encountered concurrently with an ACL tear when possible.

Indexed as

ACLgeneralkneeknee, meniscuslateral meniscus root tearmedial meniscus ramp tearpatient-reported outcomesterrible triad

Identifiers

PMID39711608
PMCPMC11662386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.