Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711590›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Comparative analysis of stomatal pore instance segmentation: Mask R-CNN vs. YOLOv8 on Phenomics Stomatal dataset.

Thanh Tuan Thai, Ki-Bon Ku, Anh Tuan Le, San Su Min Oh, Ngo Hoang Phan, In-Jung Kim, Yong Suk Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thanh Tuan ThaiDepartment of Plant Resources and Environment, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Ki-Bon KuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Anh Tuan LeMultimedia Communications Laboratory, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
San Su Min OhDepartment of Horticulture, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Ngo Hoang PhanMultimedia Communications Laboratory, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
In-Jung KimFaculty of Biotechnology, Bio-Resources Computing Research Center, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Yong Suk ChungDepartment of Plant Resources and Environment, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study conducts a rigorous comparative analysis between two cutting-edge instance segmentation methods, Mask R-CNN and YOLOv8, focusing on stomata pore analysis. A novel dataset specifically tailored for stomata pore instance segmentation, named PhenomicsStomata, was introduced. This dataset posed challenges such as low resolution and image imperfections, prompting the application of advanced preprocessing techniques, including image enhancement using the Lucy-Richardson Algorithm. The models underwent comprehensive evaluation, considering accuracy, precision, and recall as key parameters. Notably, YOLOv8 demonstrated superior performance over Mask R-CNN, particularly in accurately calculating stomata pore dimensions. Beyond this comparative study, the implications of our findings extend across diverse biological research, providing a robust foundation for advancing our understanding of plant physiology. Furthermore, the preprocessing enhancements offer valuable insights for refining image analysis techniques, showcasing the potential for broader applications in scientific domains. This research marks a significant stride in unraveling the complexities of plant structures, offering both theoretical insights and practical applications in scientific research.

Indexed as

instance segmentationMask-RCNNphenotypingstomataYOLO

Identifiers

PMID39711590
PMCPMC11659011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.