Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711588›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2024

Research progress and prospect of key technologies of fruit target recognition for robotic fruit picking.

Shaohua Liu, Jinlin Xue, Tianyu Zhang, Pengfei Lv, Huanhuan Qin, Tianxing Zhao

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shaohua LiuCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jinlin XueCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Tianyu ZhangCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Pengfei LvCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Huanhuan QinCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Tianxing ZhaoCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is crucial for robotic picking fruit to recognize fruit accurately in orchards, this paper reviews the applications and research results of target recognition in orchard fruit picking by using machine vision and emphasizes two methods of fruit recognition: the traditional digital image processing method and the target recognition method based on deep learning. Here, we outline the research achievements and progress of traditional digital image processing methods by the researchers aiming at different disturbance factors in orchards and summarize the shortcomings of traditional digital image processing methods. Then, we focus on the relevant contents of fruit target recognition methods based on deep learning, including the target recognition process, the preparation and classification of the dataset, and the research results of target recognition algorithms in classification, detection, segmentation, and compression acceleration of target recognition network models. Additionally, we summarize the shortcomings of current orchard fruit target recognition tasks from the perspectives of datasets, model applicability, universality of application scenarios, difficulty of recognition tasks, and stability of various algorithms, and look forward to the future development of orchard fruit target recognition.

Indexed as

deep learningfruitmachine visionrobotic pickingtarget recognition

Identifiers

PMID39711588
PMCPMC11659763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.