ArticleResearch square2024
Automated Characterization of Abdominal MRI Exams Using Deep Learning.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have revolutionized disease detection and treatment planning. However, as the volume and complexity of MRI data grow with increasing heterogeneity between institutions in imaging protocol, scanner technology, and data labeling, there is a need for a standardized methodology to efficiently identify, characterize, and label MRI sequences. Such a methodology is crucial for advancing research efforts that incorporate MRI data from diverse populations to develop robust machine learning models. This research utilizes convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automatically classify sequence, orientation, and contrast, specifically tailored for abdominal MRI. Three distinct CNN models with similar backbone architectures were trained to classify single image slices into one of 12 sequences, 4 orientations, and 2 contrast classes. Results derived from this method demonstrate high levels of performance for the three specialized CNN models, with model accuracies for sequence, orientation, and contrast of 96.9%, 97.4%, and 97.3%, respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.