ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2025
The actual duration of spinal cord stimulator use in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: a Korean nationwide cohort study.
Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Pain Relief to Multidimensional Outcomes: A Structured Narrative Review of Success Language in a PubMed/MEDLINE Spinal Cord Stimulation Corpus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Predictive Factors of Successful Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used to reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, many patients opt for device removal after SCS implantation due to diminished effect or complications. There is limited research on the actual duration of SCS use in CRPS patients, and no nationwide population-based studies exist. This study aimed to estimate the real-world duration of SCS use in CRPS patients and examine the influencing factors on the duration of SCS use by analyzing the National Healthcare Insurance Database. Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with CRPS who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 2014 and 2021 were included. The authors analyzed the median duration of SCS implantation and evaluated the impacts of age, sex, hospital type, and insurance type. Results: Of 408 potential patients, 373 patients were included. The median duration of SCS use was 4.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0-4.8) years. Male patients retained SCSs longer than female patients (4.7 vs . 4.0 years, Conclusions: The median SCS use duration in CRPS patients was 4.4 years. Considering the high cost and invasiveness of SCS, patients should be informed about the expected duration of SCS use, alongside potential risks and benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.