Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711238›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025

Computer-Aided High Tibial Osteotomy-A Comparative Study of Commonly Used 3D Printing Technology and Navigation Application.

Elvis Chun-Sing Chui, Kyle Ka-Kwan Mak, Randy Hin-Ting Ng, Ericsson Chun-Hai Fung, Mei-Shuen Chan, Kai Yue, Lawrence Chun-Man Lau, Clifford Long-Fung Chan, Edmond Wing-Fung Yau, Wei Zhao and 9 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Elvis Chun-Sing ChuiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-6773
Kyle Ka-Kwan MakDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Randy Hin-Ting NgDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ericsson Chun-Hai FungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Mei-Shuen ChanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Kai YueDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Lawrence Chun-Man LauDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-9627
Clifford Long-Fung ChanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Edmond Wing-Fung YauKoln 3D Technology Medical Ltd, Hong Kong, China.
Wei ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiuyun SuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1103-4607
Jin ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Jianglong XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Hongxun SangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Guoxian PeiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Louis Wing-Hoi CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Sheung-Wai LawDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Michael Tim-Yun OngDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Patrick Shu-Hang YungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

Guangdong Province Key Area Research and Development Program Project 2020B010165004Innovation and Technology Fund GHP/100/21SZInnovation and Technology Fund GHP/180/20SZInnovation and Technology Fund ITS/172/16Innovation and Technology Fund PRP/027/20FXNational Natural Science Foundation of China 81871767Shenzhen Development and Reform Program XMHT20220106001Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Digital Surgical Printing Project ZDSYS201707311542415Shenzhen Science and Technology Program JCYJ20210324115814040Shenzhen Science and Technology Program JCYJ20220818103417037Shenzhen Science and Technology Program KJZD20230923115200002Shenzhen Science and Technology Program SGDX20201103095600002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a surgical procedure for treating certain knee conditions. Proper execution of HTO can preserve joint function and delay or avoid the need for total knee replacement. This study compared different 3D printing techniques (fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering, and direct metal laser sintering) and a navigation system for their suitability in assisting HTO surgeries.

methodsTibial saw-bones were used as models, and surgical guides and the navigation system were employed during the procedures. Six parameters (planning time, manufacturing time, delivery time, material cost, operation time, and accuracy) were evaluated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-test were used for the analysis.

resultsThe results showed that the metal surgical guides had the highest accuracy (angle differences mean, 2.4°) and operation time (mean 9.75 min), followed by plastic guides, classic guides, and the navigation system. The differences in accuracy were attributed to factors like rigidity, melting point, and errors during incisions.

conclusionsThe study recommended metal surgical guides as the best option for assisting HTO due to their accuracy and operation time. And the results have implications for orthopedic surgeons performing HTO surgeries, as they can use this information to improve postoperative outcomes, such as mechanical axis alignment and quality of life for HTO patients.

Indexed as

OsteotomyPrinting, Three-DimensionalSurgery, Computer-AssistedSurgical Navigation SystemsTibiaHumansOperative Time3D printingdirect metal laser sinteringfused deposition modelinghigh tibial osteotomynavigation systemselective laser sintering

Identifiers

PMID39711238
PMCPMC11787984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.