ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2025
AlphaFold-guided molecular replacement for solving challenging crystal structures.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Predicted Model-Guided Rebuilding of the Experimental Structure of Mouse δ-Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of AlphaFold3 for Predicting Human Heme-Binding Protein Structures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- AlphaFold as a prior: experimental structure determination conditioned on a pretrained neural network.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Categorizing prediction modes within low-pLDDT regions of AlphaFold2 structures: near-predictive, pseudostructure and barbed wire.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025Article
- Resurgence of magnetic resonance techniques in the era of AlphaFold.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Article
- Categorizing prediction modes within low-pLDDT regions of AlphaFold2 structures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular replacement (MR) is highly effective for biomolecular crystal structure determination, increasingly so as the database of known structures has increased. For candidates without recognizable similarity to known structures, however, crystal structure analyses have nearly always required experiments for de novo phase evaluation. Now, with the unprecedented accuracy of AlphaFold predictions of protein structures from amino-acid sequences, an appreciable expansion of the reach of MR for proteins is realized. Here, we sought to automate an AlphaFold-guided MR procedure that tailors predictions to the MR problem at hand. We first optimized the reliability cutoff parameters for residue inclusion as tested in application to a previously MR-intractable problem. We then examined cases where AlphaFold by default predicts a conformation alternative to that of the candidate structure, devising tests for MR solution either from domain-specific predictions or from predictions based on diverse sequence subclusters. We tested subclustering procedures on an enzyme system that entails multiple MR-challenging conformations. The overall process as implemented in Phenix automatically surveys a succession of trials of increasing computational complexity until an MR solution is found or the options are exhausted. Validated MR solutions were found for 92% of one set of 158 challenging problems from the PDB and 93% of those from a second set of 215 challenges. Thus, many crystal structure analyses that previously required experimental phase evaluation can now be solved by AlphaFold-guided MR. In effect, this and related MR approaches are de novo phasing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.