Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711021›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2024

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire.

Öznur Adadıoğlu, Bilgehan Atılgan Acar, Türkan Acar

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Öznur AdadıoğluInternal Medicine Nursing Department, Sakarya University, Faculty of Health Science, Sakarya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2804-4534
Bilgehan Atılgan AcarDepartment of Neurology, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-2695-2152
Türkan AcarDepartment of Neurology, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2001-914X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe current research was carried out to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire (ASMaQ), developed to determine the acute stroke management awareness of health-care professionals.

methodsThis methodological study was performed in a training and research hospital. Data were collected using the "Participant Interview Form" and the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire.

resultsThe Content Validity Index (CVI) of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire was found to be 0.91. As a result of exploratory factor analysis (EFA), it was revealed that the scale, which was adapted to Turkish, consisted of 3-factor and 29 items, as in its original form. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the 3-factor structure of the scale. The ASMaQ exhibited strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.96) and test-retest reliability (0.879).

conclusionThe 29-item and three-dimensional structure of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire was revealed to be a valid and reliable measurement tool that could be utilized in evaluating the acute stroke management awareness of health-care professionals in the Turkish language and culture.

Indexed as

StrokeAdultAgedFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyacute strokehealth‐care professionalsreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID39711021
PMCPMC11664040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.