ArticleInternational ophthalmology clinics2025
Retropupillary Iris Clip Intraocular Lenses: A Case Series of 57 Eyes.
Article in International ophthalmology clinics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report visual and refractive outcomes and intraoperative and postoperative complications after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with retropupillary implantation of an iris clip intraocular lens (IOL).
methodsThis is a retrospective case series of patients who underwent secondary retropupillary intraocular lens insertion combined with pars plana vitrectomy to treat aphakia secondary to a dislocated nucleus lens (group A); or IOL dislocation (group B). Patient demographics, preoperative visual and refractive outcomes, intraoperative factors, postoperative visual and refractive outcomes, and complications within the follow-up period ranging from 6 months up to 3 years postoperative, were recorded.
resultsIn total, 57 eyes of 50 patients were included with a follow-up range of 6 months to 3 years. The overall mean age was 77.0 years (range 28 to 99 years), with 26/50 (52%) of patients being male. There were 13/57 (22.8%) patients in group A and 44/57 (77.2%) patients in group B. The single most common identifiable cause for lens dislocation was pseudoexfoliation, which was seen in 13/57 (22.8%) of eyes. The mean improvement in visual acuity (baseline and final follow) was 0.72 logMAR (1.09 logMAR to 0.37 logMAR) in all patients, 1.12 logMAR (1.64 logMAR to 0.52 logMAR) in group A, and 0.60 logMAR (0.91 logMAR to 0.31 logMAR) in group B. In 46 eyes (80.7%), postoperative refractive errors were within ±1.00 dioptres (D) of the target refraction, with a mean difference of 0.36D from target refraction. Complications included corneal edema (35.1%), hyphema (26.3%), anterior chamber inflammation (26.3%), vitreous hemorrhage (14%), elevated intraocular pressure (IOP, 12.3%) and cystoid macular edema (CME, 5.3%). All these complications were managed with topical medical therapy and did not require further surgical intervention. One eye from group A was the only eye that developed retinal detachment (RD) or endophthalmitis. No patients had IOL dislocation in the postoperative follow-up period, which ranged from 6 months to 3 years.
conclusionsRetropupillary implantation of an iris clip IOL with pars plana vitrectomy is an efficient, predictable, and stable surgical option for aphakic eyes without capsular support. Postoperative corneal edema, hyphema, and anterior chamber inflammation are common but usually resolve without the need for further surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.