Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39710809›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2025

The climate emergency for rheumatologists: where do we stand?

Prakashini Mruthyunjaya, Suhas Sondur, Sakir Ahmed, Rebecca Grainger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prakashini MruthyunjayaDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1278-6042
Suhas SondurDepartment of Orthopaedics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1749-4871
Sakir AhmedDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India. sakir005@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-311X
Rebecca GraingerDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. rebecca.grainger@otago.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9201-8678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change and pollution are a major existential threat. Healthcare contributes a noteworthy 4-6% to the total carbon footprint and 5-7% of the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Environmental pollution and modern lifestyles are also contributing to the increased prevalence of autoimmune and lifestyle-related rheumatic disease. In this review, we assess both the effects of rheumatological practice on climate change and the potential impact of climate change on rheumatological diseases. Preliminary evidence suggests that climate change is linked with the inception or exacerbation of some of the autoimmune and inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) like rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, systemic sclerosis, and reactive arthritis. Furthermore, with rampant industrialization and pollution, emerging infections such as Dengue, Zika virus, and chikungunya have emerged as triggers of inflammatory arthritis. Strategies at different levels are proposed to mitigate the effect of the healthcare industry and the community on the environment. The rheumatology community can acknowledge and begin to address the challenges of climate change and health.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEnvironmental PollutionRheumatic DiseasesRheumatologistsRheumatologyHumansAutoimmunityClimate changeEmerging infectionsEpigenetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.