ArticleTropical animal health and production2024
Blended phytogenics as an alternative to growth-promoting antibiotics in newly weaned piglets.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The research aimed to evaluate the effects of a commercial blend of phytogenic compounds on the digestibility, antioxidant system, intestinal microbiota, and performance of weaned piglets. Two experiments compared three treatments (diets): control, zinc bacitracin (300 g/t) and blended phytogenic compounds (400 g/t). The first experiment analised of digestibility of the dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, crude energy and metabolizable energy, in addition to blood parameters and gut microbiota in 15 piglets commercial cross-bred, weaned at 28 days of age, castrated males, weighing 9.40 ± 0.622 kg housed in metabolic cages. In the second experiment, performance was evaluated on 108 piglets commercial cross-bred, weaned at 26 days of age, females and castrated males, weighing 7.52 ± 0.356 kg housed in collective stalls with 1,5 m² (3 animals/stall). A completely randomized design was used. The data were subjected to analysis of variance, and the means compared by the Tukey test at 5% significance. There were no differences in piglet digestibility and performance. There was a reduction in the levels of the enzyme superoxide dismutase, lipid peroxidation, and haptoglobulin, and an increase in the levels of the non-protein thiol compound and IgA for the animals receiving the phytogenic compound when compared with the piglets of the other treatments (p < 0.05). A tendency in diversity was observed in the intestinal microbiota of piglets receiving the phytogenic compound in the feed (p = 0.054). Due to its important role in the antioxidant system and intestinal microbiota, it is suggested that the blend of phytogenic additives can replace antibiotics growth promoters in the diet of newly weaned piglets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39710793What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.