Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39710779›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

From spectroscopic data variability to optimal preprocessing: leveraging multivariate error in almond powder adulteration of different grain size.

Barbara Giussani, Manuel Monti, Jordi Riu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Barbara GiussaniDipartimento Di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia, Università Degli Studi Dell'Insubria, Via Valleggio 9, 22100, Como, Italy. barbara.giussani@uninsubria.it.
Manuel MontiDipartimento Di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia, Università Degli Studi Dell'Insubria, Via Valleggio 9, 22100, Como, Italy.
Jordi RiuDepartment of Analytical Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Carrer Marcel·lí Domingo 1, 43007, Tarragona, Spain.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2022-136649OB-I00European Regional Development Fund PID2022-136649OB-I00Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities PID2022-136649OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysing samples in their original form is increasingly crucial in analytical chemistry due to the need for efficient and sustainable practices. Analytical chemists face the dual challenge of achieving accuracy while detecting minute analyte quantities in complex matrices, often requiring sample pretreatment. This necessitates the use of advanced techniques with low detection limits, but the emphasis on sensitivity can conflict with efforts to simplify procedures and reduce solvent use. This article discusses the shift towards green analytical methods, focusing on portable spectroscopic techniques in the near-infrared (NIR) region. A case study involving the prediction of adulteration in almond flour with bitter almond flour illustrates the importance of particle size and the integration between the sample and the instrument. The study emphasizes the necessity of investigating the multivariate error associated with raw data to enhance data preprocessing strategies. This research provides valuable insights for professionals in the field, presenting a methodology applicable to a broad range of analytical applications while underscoring the critical role of raw data analysis in achieving accurate and reliable results.

Indexed as

AlmondData preprocessingGrain sizeMultivariate measurement errorsPortable NIR sensors

Identifiers

PMID39710779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.