ArticleExperimental brain research2024
Effects of individually calibrated white and pink noise vestibular stimulation on standing balance of young healthy adults.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardizing Stimulus Parameters for Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation.Journal of audiology & otology · 2026Review
- Influence of loud auditory noise on postural stability in autistic children: an exploratory study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A wide-ranging review of galvanic vestibular stimulation: from its genesis to basic science and clinical applications.Experimental brain research · 2025Review
- Optimizing noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) for postural control: methodological considerations when individualizing the signal for people with bilateral vestibulopathy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imperceptible noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) improves standing balance due to the presence of stochastic resonance (SR). There is, however, a lack of consensus regarding the optimal levels and type of noise used to elicit SR like dynamics. We aimed to confirm the presence of SR behavior in the vestibular system of young healthy adults by examining postural responses to increasing amplitudes of white and pink noise stimulation scaled to individual cutaneous perceptual threshold. Forty (40) healthy young participants (19 males, 25.1 ± 5.6 years) were randomly divided into a group that received nGVS with white (WHITE group) or pink noise (PINK group). Participants performed a cutaneous perceptual threshold detection task followed by 8 trials of quiet standing and eyes closure (60s) with nGVS applied during the last 30s. Balance stabilization was quantified in the ratio of the stimulus versus pre-stimulus Centre of Pressure (CoP) 90% ellipse area, Root Mean Square (RMS) and mean velocity. Cutaneous perceptual threshold was similar across groups. Group analysis confirmed that the mean CoP velocity increased across nGVS intensities, particularly for the PINK group while the other two variables remained unchanged. Single subject analysis indicated that 55% of WHITE and 30% of PINK group participants showed an SR-like response judged by three experts. Results are puzzling with respect to the presence of SR-like response dynamics in young healthy adults and highlight the need for further research using individual calibrated stimulus intensities. White noise seems more effective than pink noise in revealing an SR-like response to nGVS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39710745What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.