ArticleArchives of women's mental health2025
Risk of congenital anomalies associated with psychotropic medications: a review of neonatal reports in the FDA adverse event reporting System (FAERS).
Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Akkermansia muciniphila : A next-generation gut probiotic supporting neurorepair and functional recovery.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- A novel de novo frameshift variant in ZMYM2 expands the neuropsychiatric spectrum of NECRC syndrome: a case report.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- A cautionary note regarding the use of the FDA adverse event reporting system.Archives of women's mental health · 2025Article
- Evaluation and study of adverse reactions to imiglucerase based on the FAERS database.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Dopamine Partial Agonists in Pregnancy and Lactation: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigates the potential association between commonly prescribed psychotropic medications, such as Atypical Antipsychotics (AAs), Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), and Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs), and congenital anomalies in newborns. The analysis uses data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
methodsSpontaneously reported cases of congenital anomalies in newborns (under 28 days old) were extracted from the FAERS database, covering January 2004 to June 2023. Four signal detection methods-Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS)-were employed to identify signals associated with neonatal deformities caused by specific drugs, ensuring signal stability and reliability.
resultsThe FAERS database contains 21,605 reports involving neonates, with 6,208 cases reporting congenital anomalies. Of these, 6,164 cases (99.29%) attributed the adverse events to drugs. The top ten psychotropic drugs associated with neonatal congenital anomalies were venlafaxine, quetiapine, olanzapine, sertraline, citalopram, mirtazapine, duloxetine, paroxetine, aripiprazole, and fluoxetine. Different drug classes showed varying risks of congenital anomalies, with higher signal frequencies observed for cardiac, nervous system, respiratory-thoracic-mediastinal, and musculoskeletal-connective tissue disorders.
conclusionsOur study suggests that commonly used psychotropic drugs may increase the risk of congenital abnormalities in newborns, necessitating caution for pregnant women. Compared to other psychotropic drugs, the teratogenic effects of aripiprazole and fluoxetine are relatively minor. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS: Overcoming the Limitations of Clinical Trials in Special Populations: Due to ethical considerations involving pregnant women and newborns, conducting clinical trials is often challenging. Real-world studies are currently one of the most important sources of evidence for evaluating the safety of medication use during pregnancy. Addressing Challenges in International Signal Detection: There is no established gold standard for signal detection, and different countries use varying methods. To minimize the impact of false-positive signals on the results, this study employs a combination of four different methods for signal mining. Advancing Beyond Small Retrospective Cohort Studies and Case Reports: Most current research on the safety of medication use during pregnancy relies on small retrospective cohort studies or case reports. Studies based on large pharmacovigilance databases overcome these limitations. This approach not only captures information on all drugs that may lead to congenital anomalies in newborns but also monitors rare yet significant safety information, providing more comprehensive data support for assessing the safety of medication use during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39710735What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.