Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39710730›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Alterations of upper-extremity functional muscle networks in chronic stroke survivors.

David O'Reilly, Ioannis Delis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David O'ReillySchool of Biomedical sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. d.oreilly@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8471-9447
Ioannis DelisSchool of Biomedical sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

BBSRC BBSRC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current clinical assessment tools don't fully capture the genuine neural deficits experienced by chronic stroke survivors and, consequently, they don't fully explain motor function throughout everyday life. Towards addressing this problem, here we aimed to characterise post-stroke alterations in upper-limb control from a novel perspective to the muscle synergy by applying, for the first time, a computational approach that quantifies diverse types of functional muscle interactions (i.e. functionally-similar (redundant), -complementary (synergistic) and -independent (unique)). From single-trials of a simple forward pointing movement, we extracted networks of functionally diverse muscle interactions from chronic stroke survivors and unimpaired controls, identifying shared and group-specific modules across each interaction type (i.e. redundant, synergistic and unique). Reconciling previous studies, we found evidence for both the concurrent preservation of healthy functional modules post-stroke and muscle network structure alterations underpinned by systemic muscle interaction re-weighting and functional reorganisation across all interaction types. Cluster analysis of stroke survivors revealed two distinct patient subgroups from each interaction type that all distinguished less impaired individuals who were able to adopt novel motor patterns different to unimpaired controls from more severely impaired individuals who did not. Our work here provides a nuanced account of post-stroke functional impairment and, in doing so, paves new avenues towards progressing the clinical use case of muscle synergy analysis.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalStrokeUpper ExtremityAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurvivorsClinical motion analysisMotor controlMuscle networksMuscle synergiesRedundancyStrokeSynergy

Identifiers

PMID39710730
PMCPMC11663821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.