Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39710693›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of medical research2024

Effects of two different dexamethasone dosing regimens on ventilator-free days and long-term mortality in COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS: the REMED randomized clinical trial.

Jan Maláska, Jan Stašek, Jan Máca, Martin Kutěj, František Duška, Petr Kafka, Olga Klementová, Lenka Doubravská, Jan Hruda, Marek Fencl and 17 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04663555 (Effect of Dexamethasone in Patients With ARDS and COVID-19 - Prospective, Multi-centre, Open-label, Parallel-group, Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04663555 phase4completednot on this map

Effect of Dexamethasone in Patients With ARDS and COVID-19 - Prospective, Multi-centre, Open-label, Parallel-group, Randomized Controlled Trial (REMED Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrno University HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled235ConditionsCovid19, ARDSArmsDexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Jan Maláska *Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan Stašek *Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan MácaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.
Martin KutějDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.
František DuškaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady and the Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Šrobárova 1150, 10034, Praha, Czech Republic. fduska@yahoo.com.
Petr KafkaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady and the Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Šrobárova 1150, 10034, Praha, Czech Republic.
Olga KlementováDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Lenka DoubravskáDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jan HrudaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marek FenclDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomáš GabrhelíkDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Tomáš Baťa Regional Hospital, Zlín, Czech Republic.
Libor ČížDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Tomáš Baťa Regional Hospital, Zlín, Czech Republic.
Jan ZatloukalDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Plzeň, Czech Republic.
Jiří PouskaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Plzeň, Czech Republic.
Pavel NovotnýDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Military University Hospital Praha and the First Faculty of Medicine Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin BalíkDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, General University Hospital in Prague and the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Regina DemlováDepartment of Pharmacology/CZECRIN, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jana KubátováDepartment of Pharmacology/CZECRIN, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jana VinklerováDepartment of Pharmacology/CZECRIN, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Karolína GrodováDepartment of Pharmacology/CZECRIN, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Radka ŠtěpánováDepartment of Pharmacology/CZECRIN, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Adam SvobodníkDepartment of Pharmacology/CZECRIN, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Milan KratochvílDepartment of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jozef KlučkaDepartment of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr ŠtouračDepartment of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Mervyn SingerBloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
REMED Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDexamethasone 6 mg in patients with severe COVID-19 has been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity. The effects of higher doses of corticosteroid, that would further increase anti-inflammatory effects, are uncertain. The objective of our study was to assess the effect of 20 mg dexamethasone vs. 6 mg dexamethasone intravenously in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and COVID-19.

methodsIn a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial conducted in nine hospitals in the Czech Republic, we randomized adult patients with ARDS and COVID-19 requiring high-flow oxygen, noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation to receive either intravenous high-dose dexamethasone (20 mg/day on days 1-5, 10 mg/day on days 6-10) or standard-dose dexamethasone (6 mg/d, days 1-10). The primary outcome was 28-day ventilator-free days. The five secondary outcomes were 60-day mortality, C-reactive protein dynamics, 14-day WHO (World Health Organization) Clinical Progression Scale score, adverse events and 90-day Barthel index. The long-term outcomes were 180- and 360-day mortality and the Barthel index. The planned sample size was 300, with interim analysis after enrollment of 150 patients.

resultsThe trial was stopped due to a lack of recruitment, and the follow-up was completed in February 2023. Among 234 randomized patients of 300 planned patients, the primary outcome was available for 224 patients (110 high-dose and 114 standard-dose dexamethasone; median [interquartile range (IQR)] age, 59.0 [48.5-66.0] years; 130 [58.0%] were receiving noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline). The mean number of 28-day ventilator-free days was 8.9 (± 11.5) days for high-dose dexamethasone and 8.0 (± 10.7) days for standard-dose dexamethasone, with an absolute difference of + 0.81 days (95% CI - 2.12-3.73 days). None of the prespecified secondary outcomes, including adverse events, differed between the groups.

conclusionsDespite not reaching its prespecified enrollment, there was no signal to either benefit or harm high-dose dexamethasone over standard-dose dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 and moderate-to-severe ARDS. Trial registration Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04663555. Registered 10 December 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04663555?term=NCT04663555&rank=1 and EudraCT: 2020-005887-70.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDexamethasoneRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeAgedCzech RepublicDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeDexamethasoneARDSCOVID-19DexamethasoneLong-term outcomesRandomized clinical trialVentilator-free days

Identifiers

PMID39710693
PMCPMC11664838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.