Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39710665›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2024

Postoperative bile leak after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery in malignant biliary obstruction: rates, treatments, and outcomes in a high-volume tertiary referral center.

Bálint Kokas, Lőrinc Ulmann, Petra Rozman, Nelli Farkas, Attila Szijártó, Ákos Szücs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. [Management of postoperative bile leaks].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bálint KokasDepartment of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Lőrinc UlmannDepartment of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Petra RozmanDepartment of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Nelli FarkasInstitute of Bioanalysis, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Attila SzijártóDepartment of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ákos SzücsDepartment of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. szucs.akos@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiliary leakage is a serious complication of hepato-pancreato-biliary operations, increasing morbidity and mortality, and challenging clinicians.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the incidence of bilioenteric anastomotic leakage, treatment options, and their outcomes at a high-volume tertiary referral center.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the outcomes of patients who underwent biliary anastomosis formation between 2016 and 2021. Data from patients with malignant biliary obstruction was analyzed collectively and in two homogenous cohorts: distal malignant (DM) group with distal biliary obstruction undergoing pancreatic head resection, proximal malignant (PM) group with perihilar biliary obstruction undergoing perihilar biliary resection without liver resection.

results724 patients were found. After exclusions, 410 remained in the DM and 41 in the PM group. In the DM group the leak rate was 5.6% (23/410). Mortality was 3.9%, in patients with anastomotic failure 26% (6/23) vs no failure 2.6% (10/387) (p‹0.0001). Leak rate in the ASA III and ASA I-II patients were 52.2% (12/23) vs 48.8% (11/23), (p = 0.597). Leak rates were higher in the PM group 14,6% (6/41), mortality was 4.9% (2/41). All leaks in the PM group occurred in ASA III patients (6/6). No statistically significant associations were found between leak rates and factors such as patient age, preoperative serum bilirubin levels, preoperative or intraoperative biliary drainage, cholangitis, blood transfusion, postoperative pancreatic fistula, or bile duct dilation in either group. Bile leaks (n = 29) were treated conservatively (n = 9) with percutaneous transhepatic drainage (n = 3) or reoperation with (n = 16) or without (n = 10) external biliary drainage. Clinical success rates were slightly higher after reoperation with external drainage.

conclusionThis study identified perihilar resection as a risk factor for biliary leakage and trends indicating higher leak rates among patients with advanced comorbidities (ASA III), elevated preoperative bilirubin levels, non-dilated bile ducts, cholangitis or postoperative pancreatic fistula but these associations did not reach statistical significance, likely due to the limited sample size. In the management of anastomotic leakage, conservative and minimally invasive methods are effective; however, most cases required relaparotomy combined with external biliary drainage.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakCholestasisTertiary Care CentersAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresFemaleHepatectomyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesAnastomotic leakageBile ductBiliary drainageBiliary obstructionExternal drainageRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39710665
PMCPMC11665246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.