ReviewBMC urology2024
Intrauterine device (IUD) migration completely into the abdominal cavity and half into the bladder to form a stone: a case report and mini-review.
Review in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic management of an intramurally migrated intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) without serosal perforation: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Rectovesical Fistula Caused by a Self-Inserted Intravesical Foreign Body Immobilized by a Giant Vesical Calculus: A Case Report.IJU case reports · 2026Article
- Nephroscopic management of partial bladder perforation by an intrauterine device with extravesical main body: a case report and treatment-oriented classification.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Small bowel necrosis caused by migrated intrauterine device: a rare surgical emergency.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Intraluminal Appendiceal Migration of an Intrauterine Device Without Appendicitis: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- An asymptomatic postmenopausal uterine perforation with bilateral embedment by a V-shaped intrauterine device: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Intrauterine device migration into the bladder with resultant bladder stone formation: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Intraperitoneal Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device in a Patient With a Kidney Stone: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intrauterine device (IUD) is an important and highly effective means of contraception. Migration of the IUD, post implantation, out of the uterus is an infrequent complication, and its subsequent migration into the urinary bladder with formation of secondary bladder calculi, is even more infrequently reported. The authors report a 51 year old woman who had had her last child delivered via cesarean section 16 years ago. She underwent an IUD insertion in the next few months but was subsequently lost to follow up. Before detection of the ectopic state of the IUD she complained of dysuria and dyspareunia for two weeks. Clinically detected suprapubic discomfort on palpation. After a series of imaging studies and cystoscopy, the presence of an IUD stump with stones attached to it in the patient's bladder were confirmed. Cystoscopy followed by laser lithotripsy of the calculus was performed, as the first step in the treatment. After failure to remove the IUD cystoscopically, further cystotomy was made, however one side end of the cap structure of the IUD could not be located, necessitating abdominal exploration and irrigation till retrieval in totality. The patient made an uneventful recovery.The case report emphasizes the importance of excluding uncommon etiolgies like ectopic IUDs as a cause of immobile adherent bladder calculi in women. Complete removal necessitates good preoperative knowledge of the type of IUD, as structural degradation might lead to separation of its components. An adequate consent for a possible exploration of the abdomen in case of a missing component should also be taken.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.