Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39710502›Full record

ReviewJournal of chest surgery2025

Real-Time Fluorescence Imaging for Thoracic Duct Identification during Oesophagectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Dimitra V Peristeri, Minas Baltatzis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chest surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dimitra V PeristeriDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Northern Care Alliance, Salford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-028X
Minas BaltatzisDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Northern Care Alliance, Salford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6476-5537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative chylothorax is a serious complication after oesophagectomy. Real-time identification of the thoracic duct (TD) could prevent injury or facilitate prompt management when it occurs. Intraoperative TD lymphography with indocyanine green (ICG) is a novel technique that may help prevent chyle leaks following thoracic surgery. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies published until July 2024 evaluating ICG for TD identification during oesophagectomy was performed. Studies were included in the review if they assessed intraoperative TD identification with ICG to prevent chyle leakage in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Nine of 265 screened papers were included in the present review, with 3 reporting comparative techniques of TD identification between patients. Only 1 study had a control group without ICG administration. TD was identified in 281 of the 303 patients who received ICG. Chyle leak incidence was 0.66% in the ICG group. The mean observation time of TD after ICG administration was 162 minutes. Most of the included patients received neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. Different application routes of ICG have been reported, with the most prominent one being through the inguinal region under ultrasound guidance. Real- time TD identification with ICG might be a valuable tool for avoiding injury or managing it intraoperatively. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on this complex topic. However, as no randomized controlled trials have been published, sufficient evidence is needed to determine whether the aforementioned method can sufficiently reduce the chyle leak rate.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyFluorescenceIndocyanine greenMinimally invasive surgeryThoracic duct identification

Identifiers

PMID39710502
PMCPMC11738141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.