Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39710358›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance use and addiction treatment2025

Screening, treatment, and referral for substance use disorder in Medicaid health homes: Results of a national pilot study.

Olivia M Hinds, Melissa A Westlake, Sophia N D Negaro, Christina M Andrews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance use and addiction treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Medicaid health home design and buprenorphine receipt, 2009-2020.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olivia M HindsDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208, United States of America. Electronic address: ohinds@email.sc.edu.
Melissa A WestlakeDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208, United States of America.
Sophia N D NegaroDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208, United States of America.
Christina M AndrewsDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208, United States of America.

Funding

Addiction Treatment in Medicaid Health HomesK01DA041628 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI ANDREWS, CHRISTINA MARIE · 2016 to 2020
$694k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA041628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEstablished under the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid health homes are designed to provide comprehensive health care for enrollees with chronic health conditions. Given high rates of substance use disorder (SUD) in Medicaid, health homes have the potential to enhance SUD identification and treatment. Yet little is known about the extent to which they engage in these activities. In this study, we assessed the proportion of health homes that screen, treat, and refer for SUD; health homes compliance with state plan requirements for SUD screening and treatment; and the extent to which these trends differ among health homes focusing on physical versus mental health and SUD.

methodsWe administered a pilot survey in 2022 to all health care providers participating in active Medicaid health home models. Health home models were categorized as physical-, mental health-, or SUD-focused. We estimated the percentage of health homes engaged in SUD screening, treatment, and referral, and the percentage of health homes that complied with state requirements in each domain.

resultsOur sample included 113 Medicaid health homes in 15 states and the District of Columbia. Physical health-focused health homes were more likely to screen for SUD than mental health-focused and SUD-focused health homes (81.0 % versus 63.4 % and 55.0 % respectively). Most health homes referred out at least some SUD treatment (84.1 %). Among those that did refer, fewer than 20 % had a formal contractual agreement with an SUD treatment program. The majority of health homes complied with state requirements for referral. However, among health homes required by their state to offer SUD screening, 38.5 % of physical health-, 10.0 % of mental health-, and 25.0 % of SUD-focused health homes failed to do so. Similarly, 5.9 % of physical health-, 67.9 % of mental health- and 45.0 % of SUD-focused health homes did not offer onsite SUD treatment, even when required to do so.

conclusionsWhile Medicaid health home plans were established to promote care coordination and integration, relatively few health homes in this study reported doing so in the case of SUD. A concerning number of health homes did not comply with state plan requirements for SUD screening and treatment.

Indexed as

MedicaidPatient-Centered CareReferral and ConsultationSubstance-Related DisordersHumansPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPilot ProjectsUnited StatesMedicaidMedicaid health homesReferralScreeningSubstance use disorderTreatment

Identifiers

PMID39710358
PMCPMC11885029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.