Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39710058›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2025

Cholinergic regulation of decision making under risk of punishment.

Megan Kelly, Merrick Garner, Emily M Cooper, Caitlin A Orsini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megan KellyDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX 78712, United States.
Merrick GarnerDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX 78712, United States.
Emily M CooperDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX 78712, United States.
Caitlin A OrsiniDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX 78712, United States; Department of Neurology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX 78712, United States; Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX 78712, United States. Electronic address: Caitlin.orsini@austin.utexas.edu.

Funding

Investigation of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying estradiol-mediated risk aversion in femalesR01DA055676 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Caitlin Anne Orsini · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
Neural circuits and mechanisms underlying maladaptive risk-taking following cocaine self-administrationR00DA041493 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ORSINI, CAITLIN ANNE · 2019 to 2021
$745k
NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA041493NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA055676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to choose between options that differ in their risks and rewards depends on brain regions within the mesocorticolimbic circuit and regulation of their activity by neurotransmitter systems. Dopamine neurotransmission in particular plays a critical role in modulating such risk-taking behavior; however, the contribution of other major modulatory neurotransmitters, such as acetylcholine, is not as well-defined, especially for decision making in which the risk associated with more rewarding outcomes involves adverse consequences. Consequently, the goal of the current experiments was to examine how cholinergic signaling influences decision making involving risk of explicit punishment. Male and female rats were trained in a decision-making task in which they chose between a small safe food reward and a larger food reward accompanied by a risk of footshock punishment. After training in this task, the effects of nicotinic and muscarinic agonists and antagonists on risk-taking performance were evaluated. Neither nicotine, a nicotinic receptor agonist, nor mecamylamine, a nicotinic receptor antagonist, affected preference for the risky lever, although mecamylamine did alter latencies to press the risky lever and the percentage of omissions. The muscarinic receptor agonist oxotremorine decreased preference for the large, risky lever; similar effects on behavior were observed with the administration of the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine. Control experiments were therefore conducted in which these same muscarinic receptor ligands were administered prior to testing in a reward discrimination task. These experiments revealed that the effects of oxotremorine and scopolamine on risk taking may be due to altered motivational processes rather than to changes in sensitivity to risk of punishment. Importantly, there were no sex differences in the effects of cholinergic manipulations on preference for the large, risky lever. Collectively, these findings suggest that in both males and females, cholinergic signaling via muscarinic receptors is involved in decision making involving risk of explicit punishment, with a specific role in modulating sensitivity to differences in reward magnitude. Future studies will expand upon this work by exploring whether targeting cholinergic receptors has therapeutic potential for psychiatric conditions in which risk taking is pathologically altered.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalDecision MakingPunishmentReceptors, CholinergicRisk-TakingAnimalsCerebral CortexFemaleMaleMecamylamineMesolimbic SystemMotivationMuscarinic AgonistsNicotineNicotinic AgonistsOxotremorineMecamylamineMuscarinic AgonistsNicotineNicotinic AgonistsOxotremorineReceptors, CholinergicScopolamineAcetylcholineCholinergic receptorsDecision makingPunishmentSex differences

Identifiers

PMID39710058
PMCPMC12670459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.