ReviewNeurobiology of aging2025
Variation in brain aging: A review and perspective on the utility of individualized approaches to the study of functional networks in aging.
Review in Neurobiology of aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individualized Mapping of Functional Brain Networks in Older Adulthood.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Individualized mapping of functional brain networks in older adulthood.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
- Cognitive flexibility and brain network energy in healthy aging: An allostatic perspective from the SENECA model.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Healthy aging is associated with cognitive decline across multiple domains, including executive function, memory, and attention. These cognitive changes can often influence an individual's ability to function and quality of life. However, the degree to which individuals experience cognitive decline, as well as the trajectory of these changes, exhibits wide variability across people. These cognitive abilities are thought to depend on the coordinated activity of large-scale networks. Like behavioral effects, large variation can be seen in brain structure and function with aging, including in large-scale functional networks. However, tracking this variation requires methods that reliably measure individual brain networks and their changes over time. Here, we review the literature on age-related cognitive decline and on age-related differences in brain structure and function. We focus particularly on functional networks and the individual variation that exists in these measures. We propose that novel individual-centered fMRI approaches can shed new light on patterns of inter- and intra-individual variability in aging. These approaches may be instrumental in understanding the neural bases of cognitive decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.