Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39709487›Full record

ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2024

Accuracy of POC testing systems for HPV screening: the importance of disease prevalence and characteristics of the screened population.

Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Guglielmo Ronco

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paolo Giorgi RossiAzienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy. paolo.giorgirossi@ausl.re.it.
Guglielmo RoncoCentre for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention (CPO), Turin, Italy.

Funding

European Commission 964049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious Agents and Cancer journal has recently launched a new collection of papers about "Point-of-Care (POC) for HPV-related genital cancers" putting together some interesting works on the accuracy of HPV tests for screening. This editorial initiative gave us the opportunity to reflect on the relations between accuracy measures, prevalence and characteristics of the tested population in the case of HPV-based screening. In screening test evaluation, we look at the clinical accuracy of the test as an intrinsic characteristic of the assay, which interacts with the characteristics of the population, the result being the screening performance. In the case of HPV testing, the clinical accuracy should be conceptualized in two steps, the analytical accuracy of the assay for HPV infection and the biological link between HPV infection and the target disease, i.e. the high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (hgCIN). This approach highlights that just a few false positive cases result from a lack of analytical specificity while most derive from women who have the infection but it did not progress to hgCIN. In addition, increasing prevalence of hgCIN results in relevant increases of PPV only if due or associated with exposures which increase the progression from infection to hgCIN or the duration of the latter; while an increase due to a higher prevalence of HPV infection would only marginally affect PPV. This approach may help in modelling the performance of HPV-based cervical screening.

Indexed as

AccuracyCervical cancerCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaHuman papillomavirusScreening

Identifiers

PMID39709487
PMCPMC11662695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.