ArticleBMC health services research2024
Patient cost analysis of a community-based teledermatology service versus conventional outpatient appointments in East Kent: a retrospective study through a societal lens to reduce health inequalities.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community-Based Teledermatology for Urgent Suspected Skin Cancer: Health Economic Cost-Comparison and Discrete Event Simulation Study.JMIR dermatology · 2026Article
- Integrating Technology into Urticaria Management: Telemedicine, Remote Monitoring and Patient-Centered Care.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Time series analysis of outpatient blood collection visits: Fluctuation patterns and nursing staff allocation optimization.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe UK's National Health Service (NHS) is grappling with rising demand and limited dermatologists, leading to longer waiting times. This is particularly concerning for conditions like malignant melanoma, where early diagnosis is crucial. Teledermatology is being introduced to address these issues, but its impact on patients' monetary and time costs, especially in deprived areas, is under-researched. This study investigates the impact of a community-based teledermatology model in East Kent, a coastal region with high cross-regional health inequalities.
methodsWe analysed the financial costs and time invested by patients undergoing community-based teledermatology versus if they were to attend traditional appointments. Data were gathered from 1368 referrals, from May 2022 to January 2024 at a secondary care provider in the region. We considered the diagnosis method, appointments, travel, monetary cost of time, parking costs and Index of Multiple Deprivation Deciles (IMDD).
resultsOur study showed the community teledermatology model significantly reduced the active patient's time and cost to obtain a diagnosis. Average time was 38.1 min, compared to 96.7 min in traditional clinics, saving 58.4 min (95% CI -62.3 to -54.5, p < 0.001). Patients saved £17.9 per diagnosis with this model (95% CI -£19.2 to -£16.6, p < 0.001). Time savings were more substantial for patients from more deprived regions (IMDD 1-3).
conclusionThe community-based teledermatology model proves to be cheaper for patients, providing a convenient alternative to traditional clinics, particularly benefiting patients from deprived backgrounds by improving healthcare accessibility and offering flexible consultation options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.