ArticleScientific data2024
A global dataset of the national green and blue water footprint of livestock feeds.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutrient assessment of sea buckthorn residues as potential feed ingredients.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- China's animal-protein-rich diets are increasingly reliant on Brazil's land and water resources.Nature food · 2025Article
- A global dataset of the national green and blue water footprint of livestock feeds.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agriculture accounts for a significant share of global freshwater use, with the livestock sector contributing substantially. The production of animal feeds stands out as the step of the production chain responsible for the high water use associated with the consumption of animal-source foods. Estimating the water footprint (WF) of livestock feeds is crucial for sustainable animal farming. This study fills gaps in the existing literature by evaluating the WF of 140 animal feed products across 262 countries. Utilizing the WATNEEDS model, we quantify green and blue water requirements based on crop-specific areas and climatic data averaged between 2015 and 2019. Our analysis covers rainfed and irrigated conditions, considering crop yields, conversion factors, and feed use fractions. Results provide insights into the water footprint associated with diverse feed products globally, aiding in informed decision-making for sustainable livestock production systems. This dataset contributes to enhancing our understanding of the environmental impact of the livestock sector and informs on strategies for water resource management in the agri-food sector through more sustainable animal nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.