Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39709446›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2024

Relational anonymity in reducing the harms of illicit drug use: accounts of users of dark web- and street-based services in Finland.

Johanna Ranta, Teemu Kaskela, Juha Nurmi, Teemu Ruokolainen, Gillian W Shorter

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johanna RantaFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, 33014, Finland. johanna.ranta@tuni.fi.
Teemu KaskelaA-Clinic Foundation, Helsinki, 00510, Finland.
Juha NurmiFaculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, 33720, Finland.
Teemu RuokolainenAalto University, Espoo, 02150, Finland.
Gillian W ShorterDrug and Alcohol Research Network, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 1NN, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtecting individual anonymity is a common practice in harm reduction (HR), as it can mitigate the fears that may prevent people from accessing services. Protecting anonymity usually means applying for services with a pseudonym. However, anonymity protection practices have diversified in current HR environments, for example, on the streets or in the Tor network, which relies on technology to guarantee exceptionally strong anonymity. Despite its importance, the individual's need for anonymity when seeking help to reduce drug-related harm has been underexplored.

methodsThe research contexts included four street- and dark web-based HR services in Finland. The data consisted of service user interviews and naturally occurring conversations in the Tor network. We focused on service users' accounts of their need for anonymity and applied the concept of relational anonymity, acknowledging that wider contextual relations intertwine with situational needs for anonymity. We asked: What kinds of needs for anonymity do service users express when discussing seeking help to reduce drug-related harm? How do service users account for their need for anonymity when seeking such help? To which kinds of contextual relations are these accounts attached?

resultsWe identified connections between the accounts of the need for anonymity and various contextual relations: (1) excusing the need for anonymity by referring to societal relations: blaming Finnish society for stigmatising attitudes and exclusionary practices; (2) excusing the need for anonymity by referring to service system relations: blaming the service system for the risk of negative consequences from recording the use of illicit drugs; (3) justifying and excusing the need for anonymity by referring to personal relations: appealing to personal situation, feelings and experiences.

conclusionsThe need for anonymity reflects problematic societal relations, in which the stigma towards drug use is strong. The service users' accounts were motivated by rational actions to avoid possible sanctions and the perceived abuse of power in Finnish society and services, which the service users deemed to have various negative consequences in their lives. Societies should promote cultural atmospheres and information sharing practices where anonymity is not needed, but services that protect anonymity are crucial in the current societal conditions.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityDrug UsersHarm ReductionSubstance-Related DisordersFinlandHumansIllicit DrugsInternetInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaIllicit DrugsAccountAnonymityDark web-based servicesDrug useHarm reductionOutreach workQualitative analysisStigmaStreet-based servicesTor network

Identifiers

PMID39709446
PMCPMC11662733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.