Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39709368›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2024

Work participation after receiving multidisciplinary treatment or acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for return to work: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial among sick-listed individuals with mental disorders and/or chronic pain.

Erik Berglund, Ingrid Anderzén, Magnus Helgesson, Per Lytsy, Åsa Andersén

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03343457 (A Randomized Intervention and Coordination Program Aiming at Return To Work for Women With Long Term Sick Leave), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03343457 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Intervention and Coordination Program Aiming at Return To Work for Women With Long Term Sick Leave

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2010 to 2012Enrolled400ConditionsAnxiety, Chronic PainArmsCognitive therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erik BerglundDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden. erik.g.berglund@uu.se.
Ingrid AnderzénDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden.
Magnus HelgessonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden.
Per LytsyDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden.
Åsa AndersénDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe return-to-work (RTW) process for individuals on long-term sick leave can be complex. Vocational rehabilitation may facilitate RTW; however, many intervention studies often have relatively short follow-up periods. The purpose of this study was to assess long-term work participation 2-7 years after the initiation of a three-armed randomized controlled trial aimed at RTW for individuals on long-term sick leave because of mental disorders and/or chronic pain.

methodsThis study followed 220 participants out of 402 (response rate 55%, 205 female) who had previously participated in a randomized controlled trial. They were allocated to one of three groups: multidisciplinary team assessment and individualized treatment (MDT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) or a control group. The participants were followed up at two, three, four, five, six, and seven years after inclusion. The outcome, work participation, was assessed using registry data and defined as having the main source of annual income from paid work during the follow-up years.

resultsParticipants in the MDT intervention group were, to a larger extent, in paid work during follow-up in years four (9.0% points), five (2.5% points), six (7.6% points), and seven (4.1% points) after inclusion, compared to the control group. Participants in the ACT intervention group were, to a larger extent, in paid work during follow-up in years four (14.8% points), six (17.6% points), and seven (13.9% points) after inclusion, compared to the control group.

conclusionThis study, primarily involving female individuals on long-term sick leave, suggests that both MDT and ACT interventions can improve long-term work participation. The results also indicate some time-lag effect of the interventions.

trial registrationThe original randomized study was registered at the Clinicaltrials.gov Register Platform (ID NCT03343457); registered on November 15, 2017 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyChronic PainMental DisordersReturn to WorkSick LeaveAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRehabilitation, VocationalChronic painMental disordersMultidisciplinary rehabilitationReturn to workSick leaveVocational rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39709368
PMCPMC11663356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.