ArticleBMC geriatrics2024
ExerG - an exergame-based training device for the rehabilitation of older adults: a functional model usability study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation: Scoping Review of Diverse Intervention Effects.JMIR serious games · 2026Review
- Gaming Against Frailty: Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Training on Postural Control, Mobility, and Fear of Falling Among Frail Older Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of smart healthcare and eldercare on older adults' health and health inequality: Evidence from China.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExergames are interactive technology-based exercise programs. By combining physical and cognitive training components, they aim to preserve independence in older adults and reduce their risk of falling. This study explored whether primary end users (PEU, healthy older adults and patients with neurological and geriatric diagnoses) and secondary end users (SEU, health professionals) evaluated the ExerG functional model to be usable, providing a positive experience and therefore acceptable.
methodsWe conducted a multi-methods study using several assessments to quantify usability and enjoyment outcomes, along with semi-structured interviews to gain an in-depth understanding of the users' experiences. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative outcome measures. For qualitative data, a thematic analysis (TA) using an inductive, data-driven approach was carried out to develop themes for each user group.
resultsWe interviewed 20 PEUs (13 healthy older adults, 7 patients) and 22 SEUs at two rehabilitation centres in Austria and Switzerland. Users' scores of over 70 on the System Usability Scale denoted good usability. On the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale-16, both PEU groups rated the ExerG highly. Our TA approach identified four themes per user group. Themes from both PEU groups confirmed their enjoyment of training with the ExerG, however more variety and greater challenges were requested. Whilst the patient group appreciated the security given by the harness system, the healthy older adults reported feeling restricted. SEU themes reflected their approval of this novel training device, although a desire for increased difficulty and more individualisation was expressed. Clear instructions and an easy-to-use harness system were acknowledged and useful feedback for the developers emerged.
conclusionsThe ExerG is usable, offers a positive experience, and can therefore be regarded as an acceptable solution for the combined physical and mental training of older adults. Our findings contribute to the ongoing development of the ExerG, which will be a welcome addition to current training options for this target group. Further research is needed to confirm its effectiveness in preserving or improving functional independence in daily life and reducing the risk of falling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.