Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39708838›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

PhyImpute and UniFracImpute: two imputation approaches incorporating phylogeny information for microbial count data.

Qianwen Luo, Shanshan Zhang, Hamza Butt, Yin Chen, Hongmei Jiang, Lingling An

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qianwen LuoDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
Shanshan ZhangInterdisciplinary Program in Statistics and Data Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
Hamza ButtDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
Yin ChenDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
Hongmei JiangDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States.
Lingling AnDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8273-0776

Funding

National Institute of Health R01ES027013United States Department of Agriculture ARZT-1361620-H22-149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequencing-based microbial count data analysis is a challenging task due to the presence of numerous non-biological zeros, which can impede downstream analysis. To tackle this issue, we introduce two novel approaches, PhyImpute and UniFracImpute, which leverage similar microbial samples to identify and impute non-biological zeros in microbial count data. Our proposed methods utilize the probability of non-biological zeros and phylogenetic trees to estimate sample-to-sample similarity, thus addressing this challenge. To evaluate the performance of our proposed methods, we conduct experiments using both simulated and real microbial data. The results demonstrate that PhyImpute and UniFracImpute outperform existing methods in recovering the zeros and empowering downstream analyses such as differential abundance analysis, and disease status classification.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansMicrobiotaimputationmetagenomicsmicrobiomephylogenetic tree

Identifiers

PMID39708838
PMCPMC11663024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.