Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3970871›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of industrial medicine1985

Sperm as an indicator of reproductive risk among petroleum refinery workers.

M J Rosenberg, A J Wyrobek, J Ratcliffe, L A Gordon, G Watchmaker, S H Fox, D H Moore, R W Hornung

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of industrial medicine, 1985. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Sister chromatid exchanges in lymphocytes of petroleum retailers.British journal of industrial medicine · 1993
    Article
  8. Feasibility of studying subfertility using retrospective self reports.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 1989
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M J Rosenberg
A J Wyrobek
J Ratcliffe
L A Gordon
G Watchmaker
S H Fox
D H Moore
R W Hornung
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USN2 Biomedical (United States) · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A questionnaire study of men in a wastewater treatment plant of a petroleum refinery showed twice the rate of fetal loss in the period during employment in the plant compared with the periods before and after. Questions regarding the interpretation of that study and continuing concern about reproductive risk prompted us to perform a cross sectional evaluation of sperm concentration and morphology. After adjustment for an abstinence period, the mean sperm concentration of the 74 unexposed men did not differ significantly from that of the 34 exposed men (79.9 million/cm3 v 68.2 million/cm3, p(1) = 0.16). The two groups also had a similar proportion of sperm with abnormal morphology (49.1% v 44.5%, p(1) = 0.94). This lack of association remained when degree of exposure, age, use of alcohol and marijuana, past illness or fever, use of baths or sauna, and history of urological problems were considered. These results are most consistent with the absence of sperm mediated reproductive problems.

Indexed as

Chemical IndustrySperm CountAbortion, SpontaneousAdultEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansMalePregnancyRiskSpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID3970871
PMCPMC1007434
OpenAlexW1983401090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.