Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39708315›Full record

SynthesisVeterinary medicine and science2025

Effects of Amino Acid Supplementation on the Growth Performance of Broiler Chicks Challenged With Coccidiosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Fatemeh Izadi Yazdanabadi, Gholamali Moghaddam, Mehdi Abbasabadi, Mohsen Akbari, Bahram Satlikh Mohammadi, Parvin Khosravi, Hossein Sabzekar, Reza Farrokhi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fatemeh Izadi YazdanabadiDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3210-4333
Gholamali MoghaddamDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7580-4968
Mehdi AbbasabadiDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.
Mohsen AkbariDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Bahram Satlikh MohammadiDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran.
Parvin KhosraviDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran.
Hossein SabzekarDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.
Reza FarrokhiDepartment of Veterinary Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of amino acid supplementation on the growth performance of broiler chicks challenged with coccidiosis. Data were collected on authorship, publication year, study sample characteristics and outcomes of interest related to growth performance. Effect sizes were calculated for both overall effects and the individual effects of each amino acid. The effects of moderator factors, such as supplementation levels and duration, were also assessed, and bias was calculated. Works were obtained from PubMed, Elsevier, ScienceDirect, Wiley, Springer Link and Scopus databases, with the help of search engines like Google Scholar and ResearchGate, covering the period from 2013 to 2023. A random-effects model was used. Thirteen works were included in the current analysis, examining the effects of arginine (n = 4), methionine (n = 6), threonine (n = 3) and glutamine (n = 3). Amino acid supplementation [0.326, CI 95% (0.297-0.355); p = 0.000], arginine [0.430, CI 95% (0.293-0.568); p = 0.000] and threonine [0.793, CI 95% (0.193-1.38); p = 0.009] significantly increased body weight. Amino acid supplementation [0.052, CI 95% (0.022-0.081); p = 0.000] and arginine [0.317, CI 95% (0.049-0.585); p = 0.000] also significantly increased feed intake. Higher levels of amino acids (≥1.50%) and longer supplementation periods (≥15 days) significantly increased body weight and feed intake, while reducing the feed conversion ratio. Funnel plots, fail-safe N and Egger tests showed no evidence of bias. In conclusion, arginine supplementation has the potential to increase body weight and feed intake in poultry challenged with coccidiosis. Higher doses of amino acids and longer supplementation periods are recommended in such cases.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimal FeedChickensCoccidiosisDietDietary SupplementsPoultry DiseasesAnimalsAmino Acidsargininebroiler chickscoccidiosisglutaminemeta‐analysismethioninethreonine

Identifiers

PMID39708315
PMCPMC11662968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.