ArticleJournal of community genetics2025
Healthcare professionals' experiences with expanded noninvasive prenatal screening: challenges and solutions.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Meaning of Screening: Exploring user experience of an aneuploidy screening educational game.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Parents' perceptions of the utility of genetic testing in the NICU.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide non-invasive prenatal cell-free DNA screening (NIPT) can lead to the early detection of important health-related information for the fetus and pregnant woman. However, the expanding scope of screening heightens information complexity and creates challenges for clinical interactions. This study explored Belgian healthcare professionals' experiences to identify challenges and solutions to expanded NIPT in practice. We assessed experiences of 31 healthcare professionals including clinical geneticists, gynecologists, midwives, counselors, and laboratory specialists, in Belgium where NIPT is publicly reimbursed. The interviews were analyzed inductively and iteratively. Key challenges to expanded NIPT were identified and structured under three headings: (1) Pre-test information provision: The more is tested for, the more complex the information provision becomes; (2) Return of results: Knowing more might be worse than knowing less; and (3) Hurdles that complicate setting a (nation-wide) scope. Solutions mentioned included providing additional resources for counseling, implementing value-based counseling, and a uniform scope of NIPT. To minimize potential harms and to retain trust of NIPT-users, it is crucial that best practices for counseling and reporting results are more substantiated. Sustainable lines of communication should be developed across stakeholder groups to navigate transparent implementation of technological developments in prenatal genetic screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.