ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2025
Group-Based Trajectory Models to Evaluate the Association of Lipid Testing and Statin Adherence.
Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivePerforming lipid testing after statin initiation is recommended to monitor response. Inadequate response may indicate non-adherence, which is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and increased costs. Group-based trajectory modeling is an approach to establish probabilistic developmental trajectories of adherence, differentiating individuals by their distinct longitudinal medication-taking behaviors. We examined whether lipid testing is associated with distinct trajectories of statin adherence among individuals enrolled in a Medicare fee-for-service plan in the USA.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Chronic Condition Warehouse 5% sample of Medicare fee-for-service data between 2006 and 2015. Statin use and lipid testing were identified using claims data. The proportion of days covered was calculated for each 30 days after the index date, which was used to estimate the probability of belonging to each potential adherence trajectory.
resultsIn a cohort of 138,101 statin initiators, four statin adherence trajectory groups were identified. The four groups were differentiated as "rapid decline" (21.53%), "gradual decline" (10.25%), "decline first then improve later" (26.47%), and "high adherence" (41.75%). Compared with "high adherence," initiators who had lipid tests within 360 days after statin initiation were less likely to fall into "rapid decline" (adjusted odds ratio: 0.661; 95% confidence interval 0.641-0.683), "gradual decline" (adjusted odds ratio: 0.834; 95% confidence interval 0.801-0.868), and "decline first then improve later" groups (adjusted odds ratio: 0.936; 95% confidence interval 0.910-0.962).
conclusionsLipid testing is positively associated with greater use of statin medication across different adherence trajectories in the present study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.