ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Is there an optimal perioperative risk assessment tool for older adult ankle fractures?
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo measure the predictive value of three perioperative risk assessment tools (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-NSQIP, Modified 5-factor Frailty Index-mFI-5, and Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle Aged-STTGMA) in predicting postoperative complications in older adult ankle fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective study of surgically treated isolated older adult ankle fractures at an academic center between 2007 and 2022. Exclusion criteria included age < 55 years, presence of pathologic fractures, and having multiple orthopaedic injuries. Patient sociodemographic information, injury characteristics, clinical outcomes, and complications were obtained. Data was entered into the NSQIP, mFI-5, and STTGMA calculators. Descriptive statistics and univariable logistic regression models were calculated for each outcome of interest. Area under the receiver operative curves (AUC) were determined as a measure of tool discrimination.
results382 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 67 years, 33% were male, and 87% ambulated without assistive devices prior to injury. 23.6% of all patients had a complication: 12.8% had at least one minor complication, 15.7% had at least one major complication, and 2.4% had surgical complications. Mortality within 1 year of initial injury was 2.9%. NSQIP was the best predictor of any complication (AUC 0.74) compared to the mFI-5 (AUC 0.68), and STTGMA (AUC 0.72).
conclusionsNSQIP performed better than mFI-5, STTGMA, and CCI for postoperative complications and mortality, but none of the perioperative risk assessment tools performed exceptionally well in the context of isolated older adult ankle fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39708199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.