ReviewMikrochimica acta2024
Portable microfluidic devices for monitoring antibiotic resistance genes in wastewater.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the detection of antimicrobial resistance in aquatic environments: a methodological perspective.Biology methods & protocols · 2026Review
- Paper-Based Microfluidic Devices: A Powerful Strategy for Rapid Detection.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Mass Production and Outside Test of Microfluidic Paper Based Analysis Devices for Determining Chromium Ions in Industrial Wastewater.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Simultaneous analysis of multi-class antibiotics in bottled water using large-volume direct-injection LC-MS/MS.RSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) pose serious threats to environmental and public health, and monitoring ARGs in wastewater is a growing need because wastewater is an important source. Microfluidic devices can integrate basic functional units involved in sample assays on a small chip, through the precise control and manipulation of micro/nanofluids in micro/nanoscale spaces, demonstrating the great potential of ARGs detection in wastewater. Here, we (1) summarize the state of the art in microfluidics for recognizing ARGs, (2) determine the strengths and weaknesses of portable microfluidic chips, and (3) assess the potential of portable microfluidic chips to detect ARGs in wastewater. Isothermal nucleic acid amplification and CRISPR/Cas are two commonly used identification elements for the microfluidic detection of ARGs. The former has better sensitivity due to amplification, but false positives due to inappropriate primer design and contamination; the latter has better specificity. The combination of the two can achieve complementarity to a certain extent. Compared with traditional microfluidic chips, low-cost and biocompatible paper-based microfluidics is a very attractive test for ARGs, whose fluid flow in paper does not require external force, but it is weaker in terms of repeatability and high-throughput detection. Due to that only a handful of portable microfluidics detect ARGs in wastewater, fabricating high-throughput microfluidic chips, developing and optimizing recognition techniques for the highly selective and sensitive identification and quantification of a wide range of ARGs in complex wastewater matrices are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39708170What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.