ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Does the treatment modality affect nosocomial pneumonia and other in-hospital outcomes in patients with combined injuries to the ribs and clavicle? A propensity score weighted analysis of a retrospective cohort.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWhat is the effect of surgical or conservative treatment on the in-hospital outcomes of patients with combined fractures of the clavicle and ribs?
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingTwo level-1 trauma centers and academic teaching hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. PATIENTS: All adult patients with a clavicle fracture and ≥3 rib fractures admitted from 2016 to 2021.
interventionNone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Nosocomial pneumonia, hospital length-of-stay (HLOS), ICU length-of-stay (ILOS), days on mechanical ventilation (DMV).
results252 patients were included (212 conservative, 40 surgical; median age 62 years, 67% male). The median ISS and GCS scores were 17 and 15, respectively. Thirty-seven patients developed nosocomial pneumonia. For clavicle fixation (n = 26), the OR for pneumonia was 0.3 (95% CI 0.0-2.2), ILOS had a ß-coefficient of -2.6 (95% CI -5.9-0.8), and DMV a ß-coefficient of -3.6 (95% CI -12.0-4.8). For rib plating (n = 10), the OR for pneumonia was 1.4 (95% CI 0.2-8.6), HLOS had a ß-coefficient of 4.9 (95% CI -1.6-11.5), and ILOS a ß-coefficient of 4.1 (95% CI -0.4-8.6). For both surgeries (n = 4), the CIs were wide.
conclusionClavicle fixation in patients with combined injuries of the clavicle and ribs did not improve nor worsen in-hospital outcomes; the orthopedic surgeon should make a patient-tailored treatment decision. Rib plating did not improve in-hospital outcomes in non-flail patients with a concomitant clavicle fracture. Guidelines on non-flail rib plating could profit from these findings in combination with previous and additional research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39708166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.