ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Risk analyses for perioperative morbidities after aseptic knee revision arthroplasty.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational study exploring the association between sexes and perioperative morbidities after aseptic hip revision arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTotal lower limb arthroplasties are standard orthopedic surgeries that are steadily increasing in modern civilization. In proportion, the number of revision arthroplasties and the corresponding financial burden for healthcare systems will increase. The present clinical investigation analyzed morbidities after aseptic revision knee arthroplasty.
methodsData from 122 patients following aseptic revision TKA (total knee arthroplasty) were collected. The study collected information on systemic and surgical complications during hospitalization and follow-up, blood transfusion units, and changes in Hb and CRP levels. Hb and CRP were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, and 4. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 29.
resultsSignificant differences were observed in systemic, surgery-related and blood transfusion rates and reasons for knee replacement changes based on age and gender. Of the patients, 38.5% received a full component change, 11.5% received a partial component replacement (either femoral or tibial), 30.3% had an isolated inlay change, and 19.7% underwent debridement only. Femoral and tibial loosening were more frequent in patients over 75 years and those with longer intervals between the initial operation and re-presentation (p = 0.001). Patients with movement deficits and malposition presented earlier for consultation (p = 0.02). Prolonged high CRP levels were significantly correlated with systemic complications, longer hospital stays, and extended operative times.
conclusionsAseptic knee revision arthroplasty is a complex procedure with perioperative morbidities that can significantly impact outcomes. Age and gender are crucial factors in managing complications during hospitalization and follow-up. Elderly patients, particularly those over 75 years, are more prone to aseptic loosening and require tailored preoperative preparation. The study underscores the importance of individualized patient care strategies to mitigate risks and improve outcomes in aseptic knee revision arthroplasty.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.