ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Using clinical data to reclassify ESUS patients to large artery atherosclerotic or cardioembolic stroke mechanisms.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning model for predicting neuropathic pain following thoracic oncology surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEmbolic stroke of unidentified source (ESUS) represents 10-25% of all ischemic strokes. Our goal was to determine whether ESUS could be reclassified to cardioembolic (CE) or large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) with machine learning (ML) using conventional clinical data.
methodsWe retrospectively collected conventional clinical features, including patient, imaging (MRI, CT/CTA), cardiac, and serum data from established cases of CE and LAA stroke, and factors with p < 0.2 in univariable analysis were used for creating a ML predictive tool. We then applied this tool to ESUS cases, with ≥ 75% likelihood serving as the threshold for reclassification to CE or LAA. In patients with longitudinal data, we evaluated future cardiovascular events.
results191 ischemic stroke patients (80 CE, 61 LAA, 50 ESUS) were included. Seven and 6 predictors positively associated with CE and LAA etiology, respectively. The c-statistic for discrimination between CE and LAA was 0.88. The strongest predictors for CE were left atrial volume index (OR = 2.17 per 1 SD increase) and BNP (OR = 1.83 per 1 SD increase), while the number of non-calcified stenoses ≥ 30% upstream (OR = 0.34 per 1 SD increase) and not upstream (OR = 0.74 per 1 SD increase) from the infarct were for LAA. When applied to ESUS cases, the model reclassified 40% (20/50), with 11/50 reclassified to CE and 9/50 reclassified to LAA. In 21/50 ESUS with 30-day cardiac monitoring, 1/4 in CE and 3/16 equivocal reclassifications registered cardiac events, while 0/1 LAA reclassifications showed events.
conclusionML tools built using standard ischemic stroke workup clinical biomarkers can potentially reclassify ESUS stroke patients into cardioembolic or atherosclerotic etiology categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.