ArticleMicrobial ecology2024
Demethylation Inhibitor Fungicides Have a Significantly Detrimental Impact on Population Growth and Composition of Nectar Microbial Communities.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Fungicide Resistance of the Brown Shot-hole Pathogens of Cherry Trees in Korea.The plant pathology journal · 2026Article
- Tiny but mighty? Overview of a decade of research on nectar bacteria.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- The Role of Phenotypic Plasticity and Within-Environment Trait Variability in the Assembly of the Nectar Microbiome and Plant-Microbe-Animal Interactions.Ecology and evolution · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides are a mainstay of modern agriculture due to their widespread use for crop protection against plant-pathogenic fungi. However, DMI residues can disperse and persist in the environment, potentially affecting non-target fungi. Previous research has demonstrated that DMIs and other fungicides inhibit yeast growth in floral nectar microbial communities and decrease fungal richness and diversity of exposed flowers with no apparent effect on bacteria. Nevertheless, the effect of DMIs on the population growth of different species of nectar inhabitants and the dynamics of these microbial communities remains understudied. To address these issues, in this study we created synthetic microbial communities including yeasts (Metschnikowia reukaufii and Metschnikowia pulcherrima) and bacteria (Rosenbergiella epipactidis and Comamonas sp.) and propagated them in culture media containing different DMIs (imazalil, propiconazole, and prothioconazole) at different doses or no fungicide. Our results showed that DMIs have a significant impact on some of the most common microbial inhabitants of floral nectar by favoring the growth of bacteria over yeasts. Furthermore, habitat generalists such as M. pulcherrima and Comamonas sp. were more impacted by the presence of fungicides than the nectar specialists M. reukaufii and R. epipactidis, especially upon dispersal across habitat patches. Future research should determine if the patterns observed in the present study hold true for other species of nectar microbes and explore the interaction between growth limitation due to fungicide presence, dispersal limitation, and other mechanisms involved in community assembly in floral nectar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.