ArticleWorld journal of urology2024
Impact of neurovascular bundle preservation on biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research trends in sexual function outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a bibliometric and visualization study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Biopsy Gleason score 5 + 4 predicts worse outcomes than 4 + 5 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a nationwide multicenter cohort study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate functional and oncological outcomes in patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing (NS) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for high-risk prostate cancer.
methodsThe cohort comprised 2683 patients with clinical stage T1-4, N0M0 high-risk prostate cancer who underwent RARP in Japanese tertiary care centers from August 2011 to April 2023. High risk was defined using the European Association of Urology risk stratification criteria. Patients were classified as high risk if they had clinical stage T2c-T4, a serum prostate-specific antigen concentration (PSA) of > 20 ng/dL, or an International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade of 4-5. Patients were grouped into NS and non-NS surgery groups. Propensity score matching was performed (1:1 ratio) to reduce confounding bias. The primary outcome was biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (BCR-FS). The impact of NS surgery on BCR-FS was examined in the propensity score-matched cohort using Cox proportional hazards regression.
resultsThe propensity score-matched cohort comprised 1722 patients. In the matched cohort, median follow-up was 31.9 months. The 5-year BCR-FS was 70.2% in the NS group and 71.9% in the non-NS group (HR 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.29). NS surgery did not increase the risk of BCR in subgroups of patients stratified according to ISUP grade, T stage, percent cancer core involvement, and PSA.
conclusionNeurovascular bundle preservation during RARP for high-risk prostate cancer appears feasible without increasing the BCR rate. However, the retrospective study design carries the potential influence of selection bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39708111What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.