ReviewDiscover nano2024
Tumor microenvironment-responsive nanoformulations for breast cancer.
Review in Discover nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomedicine strategies for overcoming multidrug resistance in breast cancer: recent advances and future perspectives.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Biopolymer-mediated metallic nanomaterials: recent advancements, current challenges and future outlooks.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Emerging nanoimmunotherapeutic strategies for breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Smart Nanoformulations for Oncology: A Review on Overcoming Biological Barriers with Active Targeting, Stimuli-Responsive, and Controlled Release for Effective Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Advancements in polymer-based drug delivery systems targeting the tumor microenvironment for immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Recent advances in dissolving microneedles for breast cancer immunotherapy: local delivery and tumor microenvironment remodeling.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanomedicine, the most promising approach for regulated and targeted drug delivery, is frequently applied in cancer treatment. Essentially, accumulating evidence indicates that nanomedicine has positive results in the treatment of breast cancer (BC), with many BC patients benefiting from nanomedicine-related treatments. Currently, nanodrug delivery systems based on stimulus responses are gaining popularity because of their additional ability to manage drug release depending on the interior environment of the cancer. This review includes a synopsis of several types of internal (pH, redox, enzyme, reactive oxygen species, and hypoxia) stimuli-responsive nanoparticle drug delivery systems as well as perspectives for forthcoming times. Stimulus-responsive nanoparticles can remain stable under physiological conditions while being rapidly activated to release drugs in response to specific stimuli, prolonging blood circulation and increasing cancer cellular uptake, resulting in excellent therapeutic performance and improved biosafety. In this paper, we discuss tumor microenvironment responsive Nanoformulation for breast cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.