Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39708084›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Application of machine learning methods for predicting esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

Haichen Zhao, Xiaoya Zhang, Baoxiang Huang, Xiaojuan Shi, Longyang Xiao, Zhiming Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haichen Zhao *Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiaoya Zhang *College of Computer Science and Technology of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Baoxiang HuangCollege of Computer Science and Technology of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiaojuan ShiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Longyang XiaoDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zhiming LiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. zhiminglee@yeah.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-7953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and compare machine learning models based on CT morphology features, serum biomarkers, and basic physical conditions to predict esophageal variceal bleeding. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo hundred twenty-four cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding and non-bleeding were included in the retrospective study. Clinical and serum biomarkers were used in our study. In addition, the open-access segmentation model was used to generate segmentation masks of the liver and spleen. Four machine learning models based on selected features are used for building prediction models, and the diagnostic performances of models were measured using the receiver operator characteristic analysis.

resultsTwo hundred twenty-four cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices, including 112 patients with bleeding (mean age 52.8 ± 11.5 years, range 18-80 years) and 112 patients with non-bleeding (mean age 57.3 ± 10.5 years, range 34-85 years). The two groups showed significant differences in standardized spleen volume, fibrinogen, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, D-dimer, platelet, and age. The ratio of the training set to the test set was 8:2 in our research, and the 5-fold cross-validation was used in the research. The AUCs of linear regression, random forest, support vector machine, and adaptive boosting were, respectively, 0.742, 0.854, 0.719, and 0.821 in the training set. For the test set, the AUCs of models were, respectively, 0.763, 0.818, 0.648, and 0.804.

conclusionsOur study used CT morphological measurements, serum biomarkers, and age to build machine learning models, and the random forest and adaptive boosting had potential added value in predictive model construction. KEY POINTS: Question Esophageal variceal bleeding is an intractable complication of liver cirrhosis. Early prediction and prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding is important for patients with liver cirrhosis. Findings It was feasible and clinically meaningful to construct machine learning models based on CT morphology features, serum biomarkers, and physical conditions to predict variceal bleeding. Clinical relevance Our study may provide a promising tool with which clinicians can conduct therapeutic decisions on fewer invasive procedures for the prediction of esophageal variceal bleeding.

Indexed as

Esophageal and Gastric VaricesGastrointestinal HemorrhageLiver CirrhosisMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersBasic physical conditionEsophageal variceal bleedingLiver cirrhosisMachine learningSerum biomarkers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.