ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Application of machine learning methods for predicting esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive performance of CT-based artificial intelligence for predicting variceal bleeding in portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- Missed Opportunities in the Prevention of First Esophageal Variceal Bleeding: A Real-World Clinical Audit of Undiagnosed and Under-Treated Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence prognostication of liver disease using imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- COLEC10 and COLEC11 are new serum biomarkers of chronic liver disease.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Revolutionising portal hypertension diagnosis: the rise of non-invasive techniques in liver cirrhosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and compare machine learning models based on CT morphology features, serum biomarkers, and basic physical conditions to predict esophageal variceal bleeding. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo hundred twenty-four cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding and non-bleeding were included in the retrospective study. Clinical and serum biomarkers were used in our study. In addition, the open-access segmentation model was used to generate segmentation masks of the liver and spleen. Four machine learning models based on selected features are used for building prediction models, and the diagnostic performances of models were measured using the receiver operator characteristic analysis.
resultsTwo hundred twenty-four cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices, including 112 patients with bleeding (mean age 52.8 ± 11.5 years, range 18-80 years) and 112 patients with non-bleeding (mean age 57.3 ± 10.5 years, range 34-85 years). The two groups showed significant differences in standardized spleen volume, fibrinogen, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, D-dimer, platelet, and age. The ratio of the training set to the test set was 8:2 in our research, and the 5-fold cross-validation was used in the research. The AUCs of linear regression, random forest, support vector machine, and adaptive boosting were, respectively, 0.742, 0.854, 0.719, and 0.821 in the training set. For the test set, the AUCs of models were, respectively, 0.763, 0.818, 0.648, and 0.804.
conclusionsOur study used CT morphological measurements, serum biomarkers, and age to build machine learning models, and the random forest and adaptive boosting had potential added value in predictive model construction. KEY POINTS: Question Esophageal variceal bleeding is an intractable complication of liver cirrhosis. Early prediction and prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding is important for patients with liver cirrhosis. Findings It was feasible and clinically meaningful to construct machine learning models based on CT morphology features, serum biomarkers, and physical conditions to predict variceal bleeding. Clinical relevance Our study may provide a promising tool with which clinicians can conduct therapeutic decisions on fewer invasive procedures for the prediction of esophageal variceal bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39708084What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.