Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39708067›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2025

Forensic Dermatology Expert Analytical Report: A New Frontier of Forensic Medicine.

Philip R Cohen, Lerah Sutton

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Applicability of trichoscopy in forensic medicine.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philip R CohenTouro University California College of Osteopathic Medicine, Vallejo, CA, USA. mitehead@gmail.com.
Lerah SuttonMaples Center for Forensic Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specialists in forensic medicine assist in crime scene investigations. The forensic medicine experts include anthropologists, ballistic analysts, entomologists, odontologists, and osteologists. The experts are usually not at the crime scene; they provide an evaluation of evidence that is sent to them. After they complete their assessment of the evidence, they prepare a specialized presentation of their findings: a forensic expert analytical report. The format of the report is variable depending on which forensic expert is writing it; however, there are certain mandatory sections that are included: the chain of evidence, the methods of evidence evaluation, the results of the evaluation of the evidence, and the discussion (including the conclusion) of what the evidence demonstrates. Forensic dermatology is an emerging subfield of medicine. Dermatologists are experts in evaluating the skin, mucosa, hair, and nails. It is anticipated that the demand for forensic dermatology will increase as individuals who currently evaluate crime scenes become aware of the potential benefit of consulting a forensic dermatologist. An illustrative hypothetical forensic dermatology expert analytical report is presented. Like other forensic expert analytical reports, the forensic dermatology expert analytical report has four primary sections. The chain of evidence section is a chronologic documentation that not only identifies the protected care and control of the evidence but also the transfer of the evidence to another individual. The methods section is a comprehensive presentation of the analysis of the evidence; it comprises the majority of an analytical report. The results section provides the information obtained after the evidence has been evaluated; it should be written in plain language, so it is readily able to be understood by not only the other investigators but also the members of the legal profession (including the judge and the attorneys) and the members of the jury. The discussion section includes the opinion of the dermatologist and should be a summary of the investigation findings that puts the analysis of the evidence into context; it can include a conclusion section and should also be written in plain language. Depending on the specific circumstances of the case, the template of the illustrative forensic dermatology expert analytical report can be modified by the dermatologists who is preparing their analytical report. In conclusion, an excellent forensic dermatology expert report will aid both other investigators and the members of the legal system-such as the attorneys, judge, and jury-who are involved in the case. In addition, when the forensic dermatology expert testifies as an expert witness in court, the report will be an asset for the dermatologist.

Indexed as

AnalyticalCutaneousDermatologyExpertForensicMedicineMucosaPathologyReportSkin

Identifiers

PMID39708067
PMCPMC11785840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.