ArticleJACC. Clinical electrophysiology2025
Heritable Burden of Community Sudden Death by Autopsy and Molecular Phenotyping for Precision Genotype Correlation.
Article in JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Pathologic and Genetic Investigation of Four Young Adults with a Short QT Interval and Sudden Unexpected Death.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2026Article
- Countywide burden, pathology, and genetics of lethal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: from the POST SCD study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSudden cardiac death (SCD) genetic studies neglect the majority occurring in older decedents with cardiovascular pathology.
objectivesThis study sought to determine the burden of genetic disease in unselected adult sudden deaths by precision genotype-postmortem phenotype correlation.
methodsThe authors used autopsy, histology, and toxicology to adjudicate cause and identify high-suspicion phenotypes (eg, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) among presumed SCDs aged 18 to 90 years referred to the county medical examiner from February 2011 to January 2018. They tested 231 genes associated with sudden death and correlated genotype with postmortem phenotypes, including myocardial analysis. Family history in high-suspicion phenotype cases was obtained.
resultsOf 856 autopsied presumed SCDs, families of 359 consented and 306 cases (66% cardiac cause) ultimately underwent genetic testing (mean age 62 years, 74% male). Seventy-five cases met high-suspicion phenotype criteria (8.8%), of which 36 underwent testing; 18 families met with a genetic counselor. We found 14 cases with autosomal dominant or X-linked pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants (apparent yield 4.6%); 6 had concordant cause (corrected yield 2%). Yields restricted to autopsy-confirmed cardiac causes (2.5%) and high-suspicion phenotypes (2.7%) were similar. Myocardial genotyping in 14 high-suspicion decedents matched negative blood genotyping, thus did not support somatic mosaicism. Myocardial RNA in a P/LP PKP2 carrier without phenotype demonstrated nonsense-mediated escape as potential mechanism for incomplete penetrance. One-half of high-suspicion cases had a family history of a related condition or sudden death.
conclusionsIn this 7-year countywide study, 2% of total sudden deaths and 2.5% of confirmed SCDs had identifiable genetic cause, corrected for genotype-phenotype concordance. These results do not support routine genetic testing for community sudden deaths, particularly without autopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.