ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2025
The Long-Term Risk of Metachronous Advanced Adenoma Recurrence After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Propensity-Score Matched Longitudinal Cohort With 5-Year Follow-Up.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Defining Optimal Surveillance Intervals Following Post-Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLong-term data on metachronous advanced adenoma (AA) recurrence after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remain scarce, leading to a lack of a standardized surveillance strategy. This study aims to evaluate the long-term risk of recurrent AA after ESD. MATERIALS AND
methodsA longitudinal retrospective cohort study with propensity-score matching was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong. Subjects who underwent colorectal ESD between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled and defined as the post-ESD group. Selected subjects who underwent polypectomy in their index colonoscopy between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled and stratified into the low- intermediate- and the high-risk groups according to the US Multi-Society Task Force (USMSTF) guideline. The risks of recurrent AA were assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression in the matched cohorts.
resultsA total of 1745 subjects were included, with 203 post-ESD subjects fully matched with 729 high-risk and 813 low-intermediate-risk subjects, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrent AA in the post-ESD group was 7.8%. After 5 years, the post-ESD group was not associated with a higher rate of recurrent AA to the low-intermediate-risk group (7.8% vs. 5.5%; adjusted HR [aHR] 1.64, 95% CI 0.77-3.48, p = 0.197) but a lower rate of recurrent AA (7.8% vs. 11.8%; aHR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.85, p = 0.017) than the high-risk group.
conclusionSubjects who underwent ESD were not associated with an increased 5-year risk of metachronous AA recurrence than low-intermediate or high-risk groups in USMSTF. The findings will inform future guidelines on post-ESD surveillance colonoscopy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.